The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-6583•Leslie Dillard Branch, Iii v. Ronald J. Angelone
00-6583Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 14, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6583
LESLIE DILLARD BRANCH, III,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RONALD J. ANGELONE; DAVID A. GARRAGHTY, Chief
Warden, Virginia Department of Corrections; M.
C. MILLARD, Associate Warden,
Defendants - Appellees,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Intervenor - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CA-97-550-3)
Submitted: May 18, 2001 Decided: June 14, 2001
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Leslie Branch Dillard, III, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent,
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Joan Elizabeth
Evans, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia;
William R. Kirschner, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washing-
ton, D.C., for Appellees.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Leslie Dillard Branch, III, a Virginia inmate, appeals the
district court’s order denying his request for injunctive relief
from a Department of Corrections Operating Procedure that requires
inmates to demonstrate a Native American heritage before requests
for Native American faith items will be entertained. Because Branch
has been released from the custody of the Virginia Department of
Corrections, we dismiss his appeal as moot and deny all pending
motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.