Rickie Latimer v. North Carolina Parole Commission, as to the Commissioners, North Carolina Parole…

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6543
RICKIE LATIMER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NORTH CAROLINA PAROLE COMMISSION, as to the
Commissioners, North Carolina Parole Commis-
sion, in their individual capacities only;
JUANITA H. BAKER; ELBERT T. BUCK, JR.; CHARLES
LEE MANN, SR.; WILLIAM A. LOWRY; PEGGY STAMEY;
CHARLES CROMER; LOUIS R. COLOMBO; SAMUEL WIL-
SON; BRIGGS BRUCE; KATRENA B. HORTON; ARLENE
PULLEY; JOSEPH E. SLATE, JR.; WANDA J. GAR-
RETT; JEFFREY T. LEDBETTER; LEON STANBACK,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
NORTH CAROLINA PAROLE COMMISSION, Commissioners/
Case Analyst,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District
Judge. (CA-98-854-5-BR)
Submitted: September 8, 2000 Decided: September 15, 2000

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rickie Latimer, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth F. Parsons, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Rickie Latimer appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. See Latimer v. North Carolina Parole Comm’n,
No. CA-98-854-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Mar. 3, 2000). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --