The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-6526•United States of America v. Gerald David Davage
00-6526Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 10, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6526
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
GERALD DAVID DAVAGE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.
(CR-94-41-PJM, CA-00-750-JFM)
Submitted: June 20, 2000 Decided: July 10, 2000
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gerald David Davage, Appellant Pro Se. Bryan Edwin Foreman, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Gerald D. Davage appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his independent action to set aside the judgement in Davage’s
previous 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000) motion to vacate. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. See United States v. Davage, Nos. CR-94-41-
PJM; CA-00-750-JFM (D. Md. Mar. 27, 2000). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.