The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-6490•United States of America v. Nerika Lakisha Jenkins
00-6490Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 17, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6490
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
NERIKA LAKISHA JENKINS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CR-95-66, CA-99-469-7)
Submitted: May 11, 2000 Decided: May 17, 2000
Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cheryl Johns Sturm, Westtown, Pennsylvania, for Appellant. Ray B.
Fitzgerald, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottes-
ville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Nerika Lakisha Jenkins seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.
1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-
ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif-
icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of
the district court. See United States v. Jenkins, Nos. CR-95-66;
CA-99-469-7 (W.D. Va. Feb. 8, 2000). We dispense with oral argu-
ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.