Walter S. Lovell v. P. BARNS, Director responsible for staff, D.M.C.C., Medical

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6420
WALTER S. LOVELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
P. BARNS, Director responsible for staff,
D.M.C.C., Medical; EDDIE PEARSON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge.
(CA-98-359-AM)
Submitted: August 30, 2000 Decided: September 7, 2000
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Walter S. Lovell, Appellant Pro Se. David Ernest Boelzner, Heather
Marie Kofron, WRIGHT, ROBINSOIN, OSTHIMER & TATUM, Richmond, Vir-
ginia; Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

* This Defendant’s name is spelled Barns in some parts of the
record and Barnes in other parts of the record.
2
PER CURIAM:
Walter S. Lovell appeals the district court’s orders: (1) dis-
missing Lovell’s claims as to Defendant Pearson; and (2) denying
Lovell’s motion for leave to amend and granting summary judgment to
Defendant Barns * on Lovell’s claims filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C.A.
§ 1983 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the dis-
trict court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Lovell v.
Barns, Nos. CA-98-359-AM (E.D. Va., filed Sept. 9, 1999 & Mar. 2,
2000, entered Sept. 10, 1999 & Mar. 3, 2000). See Fed. R. Civ. P.
58, 79(a). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --