United States of America v. Philip Murph, a/k/a Phillip Murph, a/k/a Philip Murphy, a/k/a Phil

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6385
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
PHILIP MURPH, a/k/a Phillip Murph, a/k/a
Philip Murphy, a/k/a Phil,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Wilmington. W. Earl Britt, Senior Dis-
trict Judge. (CR-94-36-BR, CA-99-118-7-BR)
Submitted: August 30, 2000 Decided: September 8, 2000
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Philip Murph, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Witcover Dean, Assistant
United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Philip Murph appeals the district court’s order denying his
motion brought pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 60(b).
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. See United States v. Murph, Nos. CR-94-36-
BR; CA-99-118-7-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug. 2, 1999 & Jan. 6, 2000). We dis-
pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --