The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-6336•Larry Gary, Jr v. Captain Jones
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6336
LARRY GARY, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CAPTAIN JONES; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MARTIN;
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER RIDDICK; NURSE PERRY;
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MANNING,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-00-1-5-BR)
Submitted: April 27, 2000 Decided: May 4, 2000
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry Gary, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Larry Gary, Jr., a North Carolina inmate, appeals the district
court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.
1999) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (West Supp.
1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-
ion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dis-
miss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Gary
v. Jones, No. CA-00-1-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Feb. 11, 2000). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.