The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-6328•United States of America v. Robert Dale Shepard
00-6328Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 14, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6328
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ROBERT DALE SHEPARD,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis-
trict of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert J. Staker, Senior
District Judge. (CR-94-48, CA-97-845-3)
Submitted: August 31, 2000 Decided: September 14, 2000
Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Dale Shepard, Appellant Pro Se. Sharon Mullen Frazier,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Huntington, West Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert Dale Shepard seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.
2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-
ion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-
ability, deny Shepard’s motion for appointment of counsel, and dis-
miss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United
States v. Shepard, Nos. CR-94-48; CA-97-845-3 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 7,
2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.