The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-6321•Jerry Antonio Williams v. Walter C. McCard
00-6321Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 7, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6321
JERRY ANTONIO WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WALTER C. MCCARD,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.
(CA-00-274-WMN)
Submitted: August 30, 2000 Decided: September 7, 2000
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerry Antonio Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jerry Antonio Williams, a United States inmate, appeals the
district court’s order denying relief on his action proceeding
against his former criminal defense counsel. The district court
dismissed the action as frivolous under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2)
(West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. According-
ly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.
See Williams v. McCard, No. CA-00-274-WMN (D. Md. Feb. 9, 2000).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.