The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-6315•United States of America v. Hallanan, Senior District Judge. CR-88-112
00-6315Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 22, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6315
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
LARRY ARNOLD YOUNG,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis-
trict of West Virginia, at Bluefield. Elizabeth V. Hallanan, Senior
District Judge. (CR-88-112)
Submitted: June 15, 2000 Decided: June 22, 2000
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry Arnold Young, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Larry Arnold Young appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion for reduction, correction, or modification of his sen-
tence. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-
ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Young’s
motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the ap-
peal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v.
Young, No. CR-88-112 (S.D.W. Va. Feb. 14, 2000). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.