The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-6301•Robert M. Kirsch, Jr v. RICHLAND COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, Medical Department
00-6301Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 6, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6301
ROBERT M. KIRSCH, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RICHLAND COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, Medical
Department; NFN GUNTLER, Lieutenant; NFN
ESKERIDGE, Doctor,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenwood. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-99-1365-9-17RB)
Submitted: May 25, 2000 Decided: June 6, 2000
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert M. Kirsch, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson,
II, James Miller Davis, Jr., DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, P.A.,
Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert M. Kirsch, Jr., appeals the district court’s order de-
nying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion
accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no revers-
ible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the dis-
trict court. See Kirsch v. Richland County Detention Ctr., No. CA-
99-1365-9-17RB (D.S.C. Feb. 24, 2000). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.