The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-6236•Johnny Crawford Roberts v. John H. Baker, Jr
00-6236Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 16, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6236
JOHNNY CRAWFORD ROBERTS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHN H. BAKER, JR.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge.
(CA-99-769-5-F)
Submitted: May 11, 2000 Decided: May 16, 2000
Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Johnny Crawford Roberts, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Johnny Crawford Roberts appeals the district court’s order de-
nying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Roberts’ motion for
appointment of counsel and affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Roberts v. Baker, No. CA-99-769-5-F (E.D.N.C. Jan. 5,
2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.