John W. Hall v. TOMMY LAWSON, Commonwealth’s Attorney

00-6202Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 22, 2000

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6202
JOHN W. HALL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
TOMMY LAWSON, Commonwealth’s Attorney; RICKY
BALDWIN, Investigator,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
Judge. (CA-99-861)
Submitted: June 15, 2000 Decided: June 22, 2000
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John W. Hall, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

* Although Hall returned the form entitled “Inmate Account
Report,” he did not return the form entitled “Consent to Fee.”
2
PER CURIAM:
John W. Hall appeals from the district court’s order dis-
missing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) action without
prejudice for his failure to timely return the consent form
permitting the court to debit his prison account as required under
the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(b) (West Supp.
2000).* Because Hall may cure this defect in his pleading by
amending his complaint to include this form, the district court’s
order is not a final, appealable order. See Domino Sugar Corp. v.
Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.
1993). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdic-
tion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.