The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-6201•Walter Lee Cashwell, Jr v. Medic Stubbs
00-6201Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 31, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6201
WALTER LEE CASHWELL, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MEDIC STUBBS; SERGEANT DILLENGER; SERGEANT
WOOD; SGT. PARKER; CAPTAIN REID; CORRECTIONAL
OFFICER NEWMAN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
Judge. (CA-99-853-7)
Submitted: March 23, 2000 Decided: March 31, 2000
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Walter Lee Cashwell, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Walter Lee Cashwell, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint for
failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Cashwell v. Stubbs, No. CA-99-853-7 (W.D. Va.
Jan. 28, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.