The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-6185•Henry David Johnson v. Lieutenant Summer
00-6185Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 18, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6185
HENRY DAVID JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LIEUTENANT SUMMER; SERGEANT DUNN; NURSE
SWISON; SERGEANT WHITE,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
LLOYD W. PARKER; ROBERT W. SMITH; OFFICER MORE,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CA-98-735-5-H)
Submitted: May 11, 2000 Decided: May 18, 2000
Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Henry David Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Curtis Oscar Massey, II,
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Henry David Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Johnson v. Parker, No. CA-98-735-5-H (E.D.N.C.
Jan. 12, 2000). We also deny Johnson’s motions for production of
a transcript at government expense, for emergency relief, and for
production of documents. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.