United States of America v. Michael Ray Shifflett

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6183
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
MICHAEL RAY SHIFFLETT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James H. Michael, Jr.,
Senior District Judge. (CR-91-33)
Submitted: May 11, 2000 Decided: May 18, 2000
Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Ray Shifflett, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth Martin Sorenson,
Assistant United States Attorney, Jennie M. Waering, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Ray Shifflett appeals the district court’s order
denying his “motion for reconsideration of motion for subpoena of
stenotype notes.” We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we af-
firm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v.
Shifflett, No. CR-91-33 (W.D. Va. Dec. 22, 1999). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --