Benjamin Walker Perkins v. Charles M. Creecy, Jr

00-6169Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 18, 2000

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6169
BENJAMIN WALKER PERKINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CHARLES M. CREECY, JR.; RICK JORDAN; QUENTIN
FUTRELL; MR. REID, #1 Kitchen Supervisor,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District
Judge. (CA-98-968-5-BR)
Submitted: May 11, 2000 Decided: May 18, 2000
Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Benjamin Walker Perkins, Appellant Pro Se. William Dennis Worley,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Benjamin Walker Perkins appeals the district court’s order de-
nying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion
accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no revers-
ible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Perkins v. Creecy, No. CA-98-968-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Jan.
10, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.