Andrew A. Morrison v. Juan Arrisueno

00-6148Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 19, 2000

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6148
ANDREW A. MORRISON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JUAN ARRISUENO,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA-
99-2718-PJM)
Submitted: June 30, 2000 Decided: July 19, 2000
Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Andrew A. Morrison, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Evan Blumenfield,
KRAMON & GRAHAM, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Andrew A. Morrison appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C.A.
§ 1983 (West Supp. 2000) action. We have reviewed the district
court’s order dismissing the action and find no reversible error.
See Morrison v. Arrisueno, No. CA-99-2718-PJM (D. Md. Dec. 27,
1999; & Feb. 3, 2000); see also Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 106
(1976); Miltier v. Beorn, 896 F.2d 848, 851 (4th Cir. 1990). Ac-
cordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.