Guy Lancaster Richmond v. Joseph P. Sacchet

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6134
GUY LANCASTER RICHMOND,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOSEPH P. SACCHET; STATE OF MARYLAND,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 00-6135
GUY LANCASTER RICHMOND,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
STATE OF MARYLAND,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.
(CA-99-2450-WMN, CA-99-3861-WMN)
Submitted: May 25, 2000 Decided: June 5, 2000

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Guy Lancaster Richmond, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney
General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Guy Lancaster Richmond appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) com-
plaints. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Richmond v. Sacchet, No.
CA-99-2450-WMN (D. Md. Dec. 17, 1999); Richmond v. Maryland, No.
CA-99-3861-WMN (D. Md. Jan. 5, 2000). We dispense with oral argu-
ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pre-
sented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --