John C. Alston v. THOMAS CORCORAN, Warden

00-6094Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 18, 2000

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6094
JOHN C. ALSTON,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
THOMAS CORCORAN, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR
THE STATE OF MARYLAND,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA-
99-431-DKC)
Submitted: July 27, 2000 Decided: October 18, 2000
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John C. Alston, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attor-
ney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
John C. Alston seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &
Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-
tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning
of the district court. See Alston v. Corcoran, No. CA-99-431-DKC
(D. Md. Dec. 13, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.