The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-6047•Lawrence Michael Harrison, Sr v. WARDEN, Low Security Correctional Institute, Butner, North Carolina
00-6047Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 18, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6047
LAWRENCE MICHAEL HARRISON, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WARDEN, Low Security Correctional Institute,
Butner, North Carolina,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge.
(CA-99-585-5-F)
Submitted: May 11, 2000 Decided: May 18, 2000
Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lawrence Michael Harrison, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Lawrence Michael Harrison, Sr., appeals the district court’s
order denying his petition for mandamus relief without prejudice.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. See Harrison v. Warden, No. CA-99-585-5-F
(E.D.N.C. Dec. 2, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.