Frances L. Waymon Fox v. North Carolina Department of Health & Human Services

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2582
FRANCES L. WAYMON FOX,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN
SERVICES; H. DAVID BRUTON, Dr.; LYNDA D.
MCDANIEL, Director; JAMES B. UPCHURCH, Chief;
CUMBERLAND COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SER-
VICES; PHILIP LEARY; KATHY THOMASEEC, d/b/a
Touch of Grace No. 2 Nursing Home; WANDA
SHEPHERD, a/k/a Miss Smith; CARROL WALTER WAY-
MON, Brother of Plaintiff; JOHN ERVIN WAYMON,
a/k/a Joseph Spencer, Brother of Plaintiff;
CAROLLE O. WAYMON, a/k/a Carolle O. Spencer,
a/k/a Ora C. Spencer, his wife; WILLIAM ISAAC
WADDELL, JR., a/k/a Bill, Nephew of Plaintiff;
MARGARET WADDELL, his wife; RACHEL ANN WADDELL
ADDISON, Niece of Plaintiff; SUSAN J. HALL;
DAVID R. HALL, her husband; CLINTON WILBURN,
Dr., M.D.; CARMEN JEAN BATTLE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CA-00-319-5-H-2)
Submitted: June 21, 2001 Decided: June 27, 2001
Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frances L. Waymon Fox, Appellant Pro Se. June Seley Ferrell,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North
Carolina; Douglas Edward Canders, CUMBERLAND COUNTY ATTORNEY’S
OFFICE, Fayetteville, North Carolina; Steven Craig Lawrence, ANDER-
SON, BROADFOOT, JOHNSON & PITTMAN, Fayetteville, North Carolina;
Susan Joyce Hall, Fayetteville, North Carolina; David R. Hall,
Fayetteville, North Carolina; Carmen J. Battle, Fayetteville, North
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Frances L. Waymon Fox appeals the district court’s decision
dismissing this diversity action. We have reviewed the record and
the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accord-
ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Fox v.
North Carolina Dep’t of Health & Human Svcs., No. CA-00-319-5-H-2
(E.D.N.C. Nov. 3, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --