Christine Locklear v. Ted Parker

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2579
CHRISTINE LOCKLEAR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
TED PARKER; ARDSHIEL, INCORPORATED; GE INVEST-
MENT PRIVATE PLACEMENT PARTNERS II, a limited
partnership,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Wilmington. W. Earl Britt, Senior Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-00-121-7-BR)
Submitted: March 22, 2001 Decided: March 27, 2001
Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christine Locklear, Appellant Pro Se. David Lester Woodard, POYNER
& SPRUILL, Raleigh, North Carolina; Lisa Michelle Drabik, WOMBLE,
CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Charles
Archibald Edwards, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Raleigh,
North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Christine Locklear appeals from the district court’s order
dismissing her employment discrimination action. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Locklear v. Parker, No. CA-00-212-7-BR (E.D.N.C. Nov. 6,
2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --