The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-2559•Arthur O. Armstrong v. B. R. Taylor
00-2559Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 8, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2559
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
B. R. TAYLOR,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 00-2560
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
B. R. TAYLOR,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief Dis-
trict Judge. (MISC-00-39-5, MISC-00-40-5)
Submitted: April 10, 2001 Decided: May 8, 2001
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arthur O. Armstrong, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Arthur O. Armstrong appeals
district court orders denying leave to file complaints against
Police Officer B.R. Taylor. We have reviewed the record and the
district court orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm. We also deny Armstrong’s motions for summary judgment.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.