The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-2541•Tom Dolan v. General Motors Corporation
00-2541Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 15, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2541
TOM DOLAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District
Judge. (CA-00-235-A)
Submitted: November 8, 2001 Decided: November 15, 2001
Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sol Z. Rosen, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. M. Janet Palmer,
HARRELL & CHAMBLISS, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Tom Dolan appeals from the district court’s order granting
summary judgment to General Motors in Title VII discrimination
suit. 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001).
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. Dolan v. General Motors Corp., No. CA-00-
235-A (E.D. Va. Nov. 13, 2000). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.