Full text
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2519
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM L. OSTEEN,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District
Judge. (MISC-00-108-1)
Submitted: February 8, 2001 Decided: February 13, 2001
Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arthur O. Armstrong, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Arthur O. Armstrong appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion for leave to file a complaint. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Armstrong v. Osteen, No. MISC-00-108-1 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 20,
2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
