The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-2469•In re: Computer Dynamics, Incorporated
00-2469Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 22, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2469
In Re: COMPUTER DYNAMICS, INCORPORATED,
Debtor.
STEPHEN GARY MERRILL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES TRUSTEE,
Party in Interest - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.
(CA-00-556-2, BK-95-23127-A)
Submitted: May 17, 2001 Decided: May 22, 2001
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stephen Merrill, GHENT LAW OFFICES, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellant.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Stephen Gary Merrill appeals from the district court’s order
affirming the bankruptcy court’s order which suspended his right to
practice before the bankruptcy court for the Eastern District of
Virginia. Our review of the record included on appeal, as well on
Merrill’s brief, discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Merrill v. United
States Trustee, Nos. CA-00-556-2; BK-95-23127-A (E.D. Va. Oct. 13,
2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.