The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-2464•In re: Priscilla Hines
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2464
In Re: PRISCILLA HINES,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(CA-99-626-5-BO)
Submitted: March 6, 2001 Decided: March 19, 2001
Before WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Priscilla Hines, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Priscilla Hines filed this mandamus petition challenging the
district court’s remand of her action alleging error in the amount
of her social security retirement checks. Because this petition
seeks the identical relief sought in an earlier petition filed by
Hines, which was denied by this court, and because Hines presents
no reason to question the propriety of that decision, we deny
mandamus relief. See In re: Hines, No. 00-1924 (4th Cir. Nov. 28,
2000) (unpublished). We dispense with oral argument, because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.