The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-2463•Stephen D. Mellin v. Marine World-Wide Services
00-2463Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 14, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2463
STEPHEN D. MELLIN,
Petitioner,
versus
MARINE WORLD-WIDE SERVICES; OFFICE OF WORKERS’
COMPENSATION PROGRAMS,
Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.
(98-425-BRB, 97-LHC-187)
Submitted: July 26, 2001 Decided: August 14, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jean M. McKeen, RUTTER, WALSH, MILLS & RUTTER, L.L.C., Norfolk,
Virginia; Charles Robinowitz, Portland, Oregon, for Petitioner.
Ronald W. Atwood, RONALD W. ATWOOD, P.C., Portland, Oregon, for
Respondents.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Stephen D. Mellin seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s
decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial
of longshore benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986
& Supp. 2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s
decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without revers-
ible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board.
See Mellin v. Marine World-Wide Serv., No. 98-425-BRB; 97-LHC-137
(BRB Nov. 30, 1998; June 30, 1999). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.