Charles Davis Burrell v. GLASCOCK AUTO SALES, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Charlie Falk Auto Sales, Incorporated

00-2454Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 27, 2001

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2454
CHARLES DAVIS BURRELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GLASCOCK AUTO SALES, INCORPORATED, d/b/a
Charlie Falk Auto Sales, Incorporated; FUTURE
FINANCE CORPORATION; MARSHALL BROTHERS TOWING;
JOHN DOE #2; CHARLIE FALK AUTO, INCORPORATED;
WAYNE MARSHALL; MARSHALL BROTHERS AUTO BODY,
INCORPORATED,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.
(CA-00-519-3)
Submitted: March 22, 2001 Decided: March 27, 2001
Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Davis Burrell, Appellant Pro Se. William Frederick Jones,
WILLIAMS, MULLEN, CLARK & DOBBINS, Richmond, Virginia; Tommy P.
Baer, Paul McCourt Curley, CANFIELD, SHAPIRO, BAER & HELLER,
L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Charles Davis Burrell appeals from the district court’s order
granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss. Because there is nei-
ther diversity of citizenship nor a federal question involved in
the suit, the district court properly dismissed for lack of subject
matter jurisdiction. We, therefore, affirm. We dispense with oral
argument, because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.