The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-2436•Elder Deforrorrora Locust v. Molly Burns
00-2436Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 22, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2436
ELDER DEFORRORRORA LOCUST,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MOLLY BURNS; CHESAPEAKE SOCIAL SERVICES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District
Judge. (MC-00-46)
Submitted: May 17, 2001 Decided: May 22, 2001
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Elder Deforrorrora Locust, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Elder Deforrorrora Locust appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Locust v. Burns, No. MC-00-46 (E.D. Va. Oct. 30, 2000). We
deny Locust’s motion for the bar numbers of all judges on this
court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.