The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-2427•In re: John A. Adams
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2427
In Re: JOHN A. ADAMS,
Debtor.
JOHN A. ADAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
COUNCIL, BARADEL, KOSMERL & NOLAN, P.A.,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
GEORGE W. LIEBMANN,
Party in Interest.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.
(CA-00-1322-WMN, BK-99-5-0705-SD, AP-99-5276-SD)
Submitted: February 22, 2001 Decided: February 27, 2001
Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
John A. Adams, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael Schaeffer, COUNCIL,
BARADEL, KOSMERL & NOLAN, P.A., Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
John A. Adams appeals from the district court’s order affirm-
ing the bankruptcy court’s orders (1) determining that his debt of
attorney’s fees were nondischargeable in his bankruptcy case, and
(2) denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the
record and the lower courts’ opinions and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
Adams v. Council Baradel, Nos. CA-00-1322-WMN; BK-99-5-0705-SD; AP-
99-5276-SD (D. Md. Oct. 23, 2000). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.