The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-2362•Joseph Johnson, Jr v. Bryan, Senior District Judge. CA-97-1532, CA-98- 1368-A
00-2362Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 27, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2362
JOSEPH JOHNSON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CHARLES LEWIS KING,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 00-7610
JOSEPH JOHNSON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CHARLES LEWIS KING,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District
Judge; Albert V. Bryan, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-1532, CA-98-
1368-A)
Submitted: March 22, 2001 Decided: March 27, 2001
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Johnson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Charles Lewis King,
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Joseph Johnson, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders deny-
ing his post-judgment motions filed in his civil actions. We have
reviewed the records and the district court’s opinions and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals as frivolous
on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. King, Nos. CA-
97-1532; CA-98-1368-A (E.D. Va. Oct. 3, 2000; Oct. 25, 2000). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.