The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-2357•Frank A. Balcar v. Avemco Insurance Company
00-2357Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 26, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2357
FRANK A. BALCAR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
AVEMCO INSURANCE COMPANY; A. CHURCHEY, West
Virginia Resident Agent,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis-
trict of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-99-148-5)
Submitted: July 10, 2001 Decided: July 26, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frank A. Balcar, Appellant Pro Se. William L. Bands, BELL & ASSO-
CIATES, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Frank A. Balcar appeals the district court’s orders granting
Defendant’s motion to dismiss and denying reconsideration. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Balcar v. Avemco Ins. Co., No. CA-99-148-5
(N.D.W. Va. Sept. 21, 2000). We deny Avemco’s motion for sanctions
against Balcar. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.