Franklin D. Howlett v. School Board of the City of Norfolk

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2294
FRANKLIN D. HOWLETT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SCHOOL BOARD OF THE CITY OF NORFOLK,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Tommy E. Miller, Magistrate Judge.
(CA-00-168-2)
Submitted: August 31, 2001 Decided: September 26, 2001
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Franklin D. Howlett, Appellant Pro Se. Bernard Anthony Pishko,
John Yulee Richardson, Jr., Daniel R. Hagemeister, CITY ATTORNEY’S
OFFICE, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

* The parties consented to the magistrate judge’s jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73.
2
PER CURIAM:
Franklin D. Howlett appeals the magistrate judge’s order
granting summary judgment to his former employer and order denying
a motion to reconsider under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We have re-
viewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinions and find no
reversible error. * Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Howlett v. School Board of the City of Nor-
folk, No. CA-00-168-2 (E.D. Va. Sept. 15, 2000) (for reasons as
stated from the bench); Howlett v. School Board of the City of
Norfolk, No. CA-00-168-2 (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 9, 2001; entered
Apr. 10, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --