Robert Carlyle Berrett v. Grace Inez Elmo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2282
ROBERT CARLYLE BERRETT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GRACE INEZ ELMO,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
(CA-98-1428-DKC)
Submitted: April 20, 2001 Decided: May 1, 2001
Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Carlyle Berrett, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Robert Carlyle Berrett appeals the district court’s order dis-
missing his civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
agree that there is no subject matter jurisdiction. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Berrett v.
Elmo, No. CA-98-1428-DKC (D. Md. Sept. 14, 2000). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --