The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-2238•Michael H. Bostron v. KENNETH S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security
00-2238Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 18, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2238
MICHAEL H. BOSTRON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
MAURICE R. DUBOIS; JOHN E. BOYER,
Plaintiffs,
versus
KENNETH S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social
Security,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District
Judge. (CA-97-3154-H)
Submitted: November 22, 2000 Decided: January 18, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael H. Bostron, Appellant Pro Se. Larry David Adams, Assistant
United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Michael H. Bostron appeals the district court’s order granting
judgment as a matter of law to the Commissioner in Bostron’s civil
action in which he alleged employment discrimination claims. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. See Bostron v. Apfel, No. CA-97-3154-H (D. Md.
July 19, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.