Kenneth S. Satterfield v. WILLIAM J. HENDERSON, U.S. Postal Service

00-2205Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 17, 2001

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2205
KENNETH S. SATTERFIELD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM J. HENDERSON, U.S. Postal Service,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-99-719-5-BO(2))
Submitted: January 11, 2001 Decided: January 17, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth S. Satterfield, Appellant Pro Se. Janice McKenzie Cole,
United States Attorney, Fenita Morris Shepard, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth Satterfield appeals the district court’s order dis-
missing his civil action alleging employment discrimination. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. Satterfield v. Henderson, No. CA-99-719-5-BO(2)
(E.D.N.C. Aug. 1, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.