The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-2196•Elaine M. Foster v. Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation
00-2196Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 17, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2196
ELAINE M. FOSTER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis-
trict of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District
Judge. (CA-00-76-1)
Submitted: November 9, 2000 Decided: November 17, 2000
Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Elaine M. Foster, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Marie Smith, STEPTOE &
JOHNSON, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Elaine M. Foster appeals from the district court’s order
granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss Foster’s claim of uncon-
stitutional deprivation of property. We have reviewed the record
and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Foster v. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp., No. CA-00-76-1 (N.D.W.
Va. Aug. 10, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.