The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-2152•Ellis Harley Barber v. MCDONALD’S RESTAURANT, Incorporated
00-2152Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 19, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2152
ELLIS HARLEY BARBER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MCDONALD’S RESTAURANT, Incorporated; MCDONALD
RESTAURANT; ALL MCDONALDS CORPORATION,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.
(CA-00-2438-WMN)
Submitted: October 12, 2000 Decided: October 19, 2000
Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ellis Harley Barber, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ellis Harley Barber appeals the district court’s order dis-
missing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and the dis-
trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Barber v.
McDonald’s Restaurant, Inc., No. CA-00-2438-WMN (D. Md. filed Aug.
17, 2000; entered Aug. 18, 2000). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.