The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-2093•Deborah M. Melton v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary, United States De- Partment of Health
00-2093Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 8, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2093
DEBORAH M. MELTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DONNA E. SHALALA, SECRETARY, UNITED STATES DE-
PARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-98-
2598-MJG)
Submitted: December 20, 2000 Decided: January 8, 2001
Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Deborah M. Melton, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, United
States Attorney, Allen F. Loucks, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Deborah M. Melton appeals the district court’s order granting
Appellee’s motion for summary judgment in Melton’s civil action in
which she alleged claims of discrimination in her employment. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. See Melton v. Shalala, No. CA-98-2598-MJG (D.
Md. June 20, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.