Stanley Spitzer v. Trans Union, LLC

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2079
STANLEY SPITZER; ROSE SPITZER,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
TRANS UNION, LLC,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Terrence W. Boyle,
Chief District Judge. (CA-99-24)
Submitted: December 29, 2000 Decided: February 7, 2001
Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stanley Spitzer, Rose Spitzer, Appellants Pro Se. Keith Alan
Williams, Greenville, North Carolina; Bruce S. Luckman, SATZBERG,
TRICHON, KOGAN & WERTHEIMER, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Stanley and Rose Spitzer appeal the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to Defendant in this action alleging
violations of the Fair Credit Report Act. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Spitzer v. Trans Union, LLC, No. CA-99-24 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 2,
2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --