William Bryant v. Shannon-Pocahontas Mining Company

00-2062Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 5, 2001

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2062
WILLIAM BRYANT,
Petitioner,
versus
SHANNON-POCAHONTAS MINING COMPANY; WEST
VIRGINIA COAL WORKERS’ PNEUMOCONIOSIS FUND;
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.
(No. 99-1028-BLA)
Submitted: December 12, 2000 Decided: January 5, 2001
Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Bryant, Petitioner Pro Se. William T. Brotherton, III,
SPILMAN, THOMAS & BATTLE, P.L.L.C., Charleston, West Virginia;
Patricia May Nece, Barry H. Joyner, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
William Bryant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s
decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial
of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West
1986 & Supp. 2000). Our review of the record discloses that the
Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
Board. See Bryant v. DOWCP, No. 99-1028-BLA (BRB June 30, 2000).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.