Kayode Raji v. U.s. Immigration & Naturalization Service

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2006
KAYODE RAJI,
Petitioner,
versus
U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE;
JANET RENO,
Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A71-792-971)
Submitted: January 26, 2001 Decided: February 7, 2001
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Taiwo A. Agbaje, AGBAJE & ASSOCIATES, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland,
for Petitioner. David W. Ogden, Assistant Attorney General,
Margaret J. Perry, Senior Litigation Counsel, Julia K. Doig, Office
of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Washington, D.C., for Respondents.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Kayode Raji seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’
(“Board”) decision and order denying his motion to reopen his
immigration proceedings as untimely. Our review of the record dis-
closes that the Board properly dismissed Raji’s motion to reopen as
untimely. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board.
See Raji v. INS, No. A71-792-971 (B.I.A. July 21, 2000). We deny
Raji’s motion to supplement the record with newly discovered evi-
dence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --