The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-1996•Johnny F. Coley v. North Carolina Industrial Commission
00-1996Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 19, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1996
JOHNNY F. COLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NORTH CAROLINA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION; THE CITY
OF ROCKY MOUNT, NORTH CAROLINA; E. O. MAR-
SIGLI, MD; JOHN BADLEY, Dr.; JOHN STEEL, Dr.;
RUSSELL KIRBY; TAFT & TAFT; EAST CAROLINA
UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE; DUKE UNIVERSITY
MEDICAL CENTER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-00-90-4-H-3)
Submitted: December 14, 2000 Decided: December 19, 2000
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Johnny F. Coley, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Johnny F. Coley appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e) (West 1994 & Supp.
2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. Coley v. North Carolina Indus.
Comm’n, No. CA-00-90-4-H-3 (E.D.N.C. June 27, 2000). In addition,
we deny all pending motions and dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.