The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-1992•Kamran Tavakoli-Nouri v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, a/k/a Amtrak
00-1992Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 19, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1992
KAMRAN TAVAKOLI-NOURI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, a/k/a
Amtrak; MICHAEL BIBLEHIMER; MARILYN C.
BROOKHARDT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-99-
3632-AMD)
Submitted: October 12, 2000 Decided: October 19, 2000
Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kamran Tavakoli-Nouri, Appellant Pro Se. Patricia McHugh Lambert,
Stuart Alan Schadt, Sheri Nicole Green, HODES, ULMAN, PESSIN &
KATZ, P.A., Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kamran Tavakoli-Nouri appeals the district court’s order dis-
missing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and the dis-
trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Tavakoli-
Nouri v. Nat’l R.R. Passenger Corp., No. CA-99-3632-AMD (E.D. Va.
July 18, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.