The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-1951•Carl C. Thorn v. Itmann Coal Company
00-1951Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 29, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1951
CARL C. THORN,
Petitioner,
versus
ITMANN COAL COMPANY; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF
WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNTIED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
Respondents.
On petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.
(99-208-BLA)
Argued: June 6, 2001 Decided: June 29, 2001
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
Petition for review denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ARGUED: S.F. Raymond Smith, RUNDLE & RUNDLE, L.C., Pineville, West
Virginia, for Petitioner. Kathy Lynn Snyder, JACKSON & KELLY,
Morgantown, West Virginia, for Respondents. ON BRIEF: Mary Rich
Maloy, JACKSON & KELLY, P.L.L.C., Charleston, West Virginia, for
Respondent Itmann Coal.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Following oral argument and having considered the briefs and
the record, we find no reversible error in the June 9, 2000, deci-
sion of the Benefits Review Board, BRB No. 99-0208 BLA, affirming
the administrative law judge’s October 29, 1998, decision and order
on remand denying benefits.
Accordingly, for the reasons substantially expressed in the
opinion of the Benefits Review Board, the petition for review is
DENIED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.