Lewis Banks v. Stoneybrook Apartment

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1893
LEWIS BANKS; BEVERLY BANKS,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
STONEYBROOK APARTMENT,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District
Judge. (CA-99-561-1)
Submitted: October 12, 2000 Decided: October 19, 2000
Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lewis Banks, Beverly Banks, Appellants Pro Se. Stanley Leigh
Rodenbough, IV, Harold Arthur Bolick, II, BROOKS, PIERCE, MCLENDON,
HUMPHREY & LEONARD, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Lewis and Beverly Banks appeal from the district court’s order
dismissing their complaint filed under the Fair Credit Reporting
Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1681-1681u (West Supp. 2000). Our review of
the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Banks v. Stoneybrook Apartment, No. CA-99-561-1
(M.D.N.C. June 1, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --