Arthur O. Armstrong v. John Doe

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1861
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHN DOE,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 01-1004
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHN DOE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District
Judge. (MISC-00-50-1)
Submitted: February 8, 2001 Decided: February 13, 2001

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arthur O. Armstrong, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Arthur O. Armstrong appeals the
district court’s orders denying his motion for leave to file a
complaint and denying his motions for summary judgment and recon-
sideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. Armstrong v. Doe, No. MISC-00-50-
1 (M.D.N.C. June 12 & Dec. 13, 2000). We also deny Armstrong’s
motion filed in No. 00-1861 seeking permission to file a motion for
relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --