Arthur O. Armstrong v. Benjamin S. Marks, Jr

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1860
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BENJAMIN S. MARKS, JR.; H. TERRY HUTCHENS;
CONNIE INVERSTINE; UC LENDING CORPORATION;
BRENDA FLINCLUM,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District
Judge. (MISC-00-45-1)
Submitted: August 30, 2000 Decided: September 6, 2000
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arthur O. Armstrong, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Arthur O. Armstrong appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion for leave to file a complaint. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Armstrong v. Marks, No. MISC-00-45-1 (M.D.N.C. June 12, 2000). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --